Peer Review
All manuscripts submitted for publication will undergo rigorous peer review, based on an initial screening by members of the Editorial Board (as format of the manuscript, originality of the study, language used, and interest for our readership) and then a blind review process by at least two anonymous reviewers. The review process is expected to take about 3 months.
Those papers judged by the editors that are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal, are rejected promptly without external review (although these decisions may be based on informal advice from specialists in the field).
Libertas Mathematica (new series) employs single blind reviewing, where the referee remains anonymous throughout the process. Editorial Board is the only authority to enable the communication between the author(s) and the manuscript reviewers.
We use the OJS software (help for using OJS see here).
Review Policy
Those papers judged by the editors that are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal, are rejected promptly without external review (although these decisions may be based on informal advice from specialists in the field).
Libertas Mathematica (new series) employs single blind reviewing, where the referee remains anonymous throughout the process. Editorial Board is the only authority to enable the communication between the author(s) and the manuscript reviewers.
Review Web System
All the submission and review process is made ONLINE.We use the OJS software (help for using OJS see here).